Dave Ferris wrote:I chimed in on jazzrock's thread. I just re-bought the CP88 because of the new os update which allows you to tweak the velocity response on the action, which is my main complaint on the CP88. I like the CFX sound as it is. While the update helps, I still don't feel a world of difference in the basic action.
Yamahas aside, even though I had pretty much written the Nord Grand off, I'm actually considering it again. Yes I'm nuts.
Dave you are not nuts, it's these products that are beaitiful an always incomplete for a nerd audience.
On the grand I would now say... Go for it (now that I own the cp88 and the grand in the same room and am trying them both also connecting them via midi to feel the respective sounds with exchanged actions hehe..)
One thing I can firmly say: not only is the kawai action enableing you to swing your lines and comp at different sound level easily, but also the way the nord throw out the sound regardless of the action is way way more dynamic than the yamaha. It's as if yamaha sampled with an embedded limiter working his way say... 0,5 seconds after the hammer sound is played, expecially in the higher registry, while nord lets the piano throw out all that it can without any postprocessing, at least as far as the dynamic is concerned. And the difference in the power you can throw with the nord when you want it to is huge. And this is what I get and what I need when I play a real acoustic.
Now, I would like the wooden cp88 keys with the kawai graded RHIII mechanics and the nord library with the addiction of a nord revised cfx, c7 and hamburg.
Let's dream.
Meanwhile, I think I will keep the grand.
Should you try the nord again, don't miss the uprights: amber, grand and mellow can really be something in a live context. The amber let your lines shine, I've had some good trio gigs with it, I also had some good gigs with the mellow while the grand upright (yamaha U3) is to be heared to know how good it can behave in a quartet and similar noisy formation.