Yes, all in all, I think you are saying one should accept the (a) new instrument purely on it's own merits.RedLeo wrote:There will be some stuff that you will still miss. There will probably be a ton of tedious re-programming of sounds and setups for live work especially. This is where a knowledge of sound and synth programming will be invaluable; if you know how your sounds are created, you can usually rebuild essential sounds without too much trouble. And even if you don't have that knowledge, almost all keyboards come with extensive sound libraries on board - chances are you'll find at least acceptable substitutes for almost anything, and you'll find a wealth of brand new and improved sounds that your old keyboard just couldn't do - after all, that's why you decided to upgrade in the first place, right? Even if you're actually downgrading for reasons of weight, size or budget, you'll find a ton of useful stuff on practically any keyboard these days.
You'll always miss something about old girlfriend - her cute smile or curly hair, but new girlfriend is a whole new adventure.
I think my current negative attitude has been shaped over the past 25 x years based upon the fact that I have, chronologically, moved through my family tree of keyboards in a particular fashion. It has been something like this (I have boiled it down to the mainstays):
Fender Rhodes Stage Mk2,
Korg Poly 61,
Yamaha DX21,
Korg M1,
Roland U20,
Roland XV5050 (module),
Nord Stage Classic,
MiniMoog Model D,
Roland Juno 6,
Hohner E7 Clavinet.
So you can see they ALL offer/provide something quite DIFFERENT to their predecessor and also, the two KORG's and three ROLAND's are of different entities. But I have happily accepted this fact because the (Korg) POLY 61 and M1 are at opposite ends of the spectrum to each other. And any changes have of course been much welcomed (the PIANO sound on the Korg M1 was far superior to the PIANO on the POLY 61!). Whereas, moving from a (say) NS2 to a NS3, I would have thought that most potential buyers would (for the simple reason that they both fall very much under STAGE umbrella) indeed WANT the next generation model to be downwards compatible? Imagine if you UPDATED from Windows_8 to Windows_10 and only 30% of your FILES would open/play/read in the latter mentioned?! I find it a delightful part of the purchasing/demonstrating process when the salesman replies: "Yes Paul, you can indeed load all of your old Nord sounds into this newer model". Also, by making the new instrument so different/incompatible (call it what you will), then they may as well RENAME it as well (eg the Nord Supertastic Professional). But I am not going to argue here anymore and I do always seem to be in the great minority on most things relating to the NORD! lol
To come full circle (back to the previous thread), regarding the SAMPLER and ARPEGGIATOR on the NS2, I could take them or leave them (but I might possibly enjoy the SAMPLER if I did buy one). What I mean is: I currently don't gaze down on my NSC and wish that it had both/either of these features. I am not sure if the ORGAN section has been UPDATED(?), but even if it has, I find the NSC ORGAN not to be lacking in anything (to my ears at least). In fact, a couple of my NS2 mates confessed that they really miss the FLASHING LEZLIE SPEED LED! But as for MEMORY (I am forever playing musical-solitaire!), and in fear of PIANO's becoming even larger MB (and also in hope that Nord increase the sizes of all of their RHODES samples!), having a mere arsenal of 128MB at my dispense is not very reassuring!
Best,
Paul