Gambold wrote:What is the big disappointment here?<
...
my own personal disappointments in the memory size, pricing, and lack of "something new" - I'll be passing.
Pricing... expensive, no doubt. If people were expecting a bargain, I could have predicted they'd likely be disappointed.
Memory size... It's double what you have in your E6. Based on your usage, would having "only" double what you have really be an impediment for what you expect to be doing in the next 5 years or whatever?
"Something new" is nebulous. I'm not sure any updated Nord ever made had something so revolutionary when that new model came out where people said "wow, I never would have expected that, where did they pull THAT from?" Nor do I think any "updated model" from Korg, Yamaha, or Roland has ever created that kind of jaw-drop. Something really "different" usually rates its own name. Anything that is an updated version of a previous model (i.e. indicated by a new number or letters) is going to be evolutionary, almost by definition. Other than memory (and a lower price, good luck), what did
you really expect/hope for from this?
Duplobaustein wrote:This feature set is even underwhelming my least expectations...the amount of chuzpe Clavia has is unlimited obviously.

Same question... what did you really expect/hope for? What were those least expectations?
I see lots of useful progress here. To me, the addition of the Preset Library is huge... that will make a big difference in the ease of assembling patches. No longer having to decide between a model with drawbars or a model with LEDs that show the current position is nice... though we are losing the buttons that let us smoothly move them from that position. Live use at the gig is improved with the 8 patch select buttons and the completely independent and simultaneously accessible on/off/volume controls for each of the 8 sounds (2 organ, 2 piano, 3 other). I suspect I'll prefer editing many of the synth parameters from the screen, if it will allow me to adjust the parameters with endless controllers. (Not as good as the LED-circled rotary encoders of the Nord Lead 3, but better than the lack of anything but the fixed jump-when-you-move-them knobs on the NS3.)
Just as some people preferred the NS2 to the NS3, I'm sure there will be people who prefer the NS3 to the NS4, whether for song mode or drawbuttons or something else. On balance, I suspect most people will prefer the NS4. Whether it's worth the money is, of course, a different issue.
Gambold, if your NE6 falls short for what you'd like, and you can't justify the cost of the NS4, I don't know why a well-priced NS3 should be dismissed just because it's "old technology." It's still mostly better than what you have. If you like the Nord approach and sounds, getting an NS3 might be the only way to get something better at a more affordable price for some time. Unless you are just going to hope that the Electro 7 will have the right feature/price combination for you.
StrangeAeons wrote:What I'm terribly disappointed about is the organ engine. The C2D was released back in 2012: a company such as Nord which strives to offer the best sound quality and became one of the most successful keyboard manufacturers thanks to their Hammond emulation (and their digital synths) can't just say "well, it's still decent, let's leave it at that". The B3 engine had to be updated.
My guess: They don't know how to make it clearly any better than it is. Or at least, how to do it within the resources available while the board is also doing everything else it has to do. And you know, even among other brands, people don't agree about which ones sound better than which. Keep in mind, Nord has made improvements in the past... and every time, a bunch of people will say they liked the older one better. And honestly, I still think it's quite good. Of all the boards that aren't stand-alone clonewheels with little-to-no other capabilities, I think the Nord is arguably near the top. It at least beats the clonewheel options from Korg/Vox, Roland, Kurzweil, and Dexibell, IMO. To me, it also beats any multi-sound Hammond except the SK Pro. I think the only other board of its type that is really competitive is the Yamaha YC series. So to me, it's not like they're lagging this field, they're closer to leading it.