NS2 vs the world.
Posted: 14 Jun 2012, 23:44
Well today I happened to go to a store where I had literally side by side a Motif XF, a KRONOS, an OASYS, a KORG SV-1, KORG M50, KORG Trident (yea THAT Trident), Kawai Mp10, Roland Juno Stage and a Nord Stage 2 88.
The NS2 for my taste has the best keybed for playing pianos, it is in some way similar to my Kawai RX-1. It is not hard, some may say it even has little resistance, but I found it very responsive. Of them all I found that to be the most inspiring keybed due to the easyness of playing (you are not fighting the action). The only keybed I found better was the Mp-10´s, which seems to have a full piano mechanism inside. Downside is that the thing is damn big and heavy, sort of the Big Yamaha CP keyboards.
I tried out the organ on all other ones, and I found none of them to be as good. I think that the Korg´s CX3 engine on the OASYS and KRONOs was definitely great. But it sounded too "bright" for me. At least on the presets. But that means that to get a very realistic B3 you have to do some editing, which does not happen on the NS2, you got a great organ from the start.
The biggest surprise to me was the Trident. I did not expect to ever see one in person. Let alone play one. It was not fully functional but the "String" section worked. And it worked wonders. It was sort of "leaking" in sound, but it was so damn good. I just cannot describe it.
Then the OASYS. That is true HD sound. You can just hear the difference in the AD converters, they are simply top of the line, pristine. But to my surprise the M50 actually DOES sound like an OASYS!! sure the OASYS does things the M50 can´t, but even some presets are almost the same, which makes it sound even closer. In spite of the OASYS being better looking the real beast seemed to be the KRONOS, I think it was truly a step ahead for KORG. I cannot say the sound is better, but boy it does sound good. Some of the orchestral patches and acoustics are simply wonderful. The Pianos I think do rival the Nord´s, but the C2 engine is better than the CX3. And the rhodes, I do not know why people say that Nords are not good. to my ears, they are equal. But I felt that the SV-1 was definitely inferior in every aspect, even EPs. Maybe it was just the keybed.
Then came the Motif XF. After the very logical and easy approach of the Korgs, I found the Motif to be even cryptical at times and I struggled a bit to actually get it to do what I wanted. On the User interface side, this is probably the worst of the top keyboards (well, I have not tried Kurzweil). Compared to even the Nords one velocity layer samples, I found the sound to be somewhat of inferior quality. I do not know if that is linked to the fact that it was the 61 key version, but the NS2 felt of higher quality overall. I know everybody praised the Yamahas for their acoustic sounds but now adays I think Korg is definitely ahead in every single aspect. Specially the full orchestral sounds, I found the Motif ones to be uninspiring. Maybe I was expecting too much and got disappointed. NS2 has better pianos. Way better.
Afterwards, I tried the Juno Stage.. Man such a different league! it feels so cheap, the sounds are very GENERAL-MIDI like compared to the top notch workstations. I have seen people try to compare that one to the Nord Stage, specially because fo the price difference. But the Juno is IMO extremely inferior to the NS2. only good things about it is the audio routing possibilites, which do work and seems like its going to be useful to someone.
Then I tried the Kawai MP-10. The piano and EP sounds were fantastic, they definitely impressed me. It has a very limited sonic range, but the few sounds it has are extremely good. Just like the Nord Stage.
So that´s my story. If you have any specific questions as to how what compares to what feel free to ask them. I hope that after spending 1 hr on each, I can answer any doubt.
The NS2 for my taste has the best keybed for playing pianos, it is in some way similar to my Kawai RX-1. It is not hard, some may say it even has little resistance, but I found it very responsive. Of them all I found that to be the most inspiring keybed due to the easyness of playing (you are not fighting the action). The only keybed I found better was the Mp-10´s, which seems to have a full piano mechanism inside. Downside is that the thing is damn big and heavy, sort of the Big Yamaha CP keyboards.
I tried out the organ on all other ones, and I found none of them to be as good. I think that the Korg´s CX3 engine on the OASYS and KRONOs was definitely great. But it sounded too "bright" for me. At least on the presets. But that means that to get a very realistic B3 you have to do some editing, which does not happen on the NS2, you got a great organ from the start.
The biggest surprise to me was the Trident. I did not expect to ever see one in person. Let alone play one. It was not fully functional but the "String" section worked. And it worked wonders. It was sort of "leaking" in sound, but it was so damn good. I just cannot describe it.
Then the OASYS. That is true HD sound. You can just hear the difference in the AD converters, they are simply top of the line, pristine. But to my surprise the M50 actually DOES sound like an OASYS!! sure the OASYS does things the M50 can´t, but even some presets are almost the same, which makes it sound even closer. In spite of the OASYS being better looking the real beast seemed to be the KRONOS, I think it was truly a step ahead for KORG. I cannot say the sound is better, but boy it does sound good. Some of the orchestral patches and acoustics are simply wonderful. The Pianos I think do rival the Nord´s, but the C2 engine is better than the CX3. And the rhodes, I do not know why people say that Nords are not good. to my ears, they are equal. But I felt that the SV-1 was definitely inferior in every aspect, even EPs. Maybe it was just the keybed.
Then came the Motif XF. After the very logical and easy approach of the Korgs, I found the Motif to be even cryptical at times and I struggled a bit to actually get it to do what I wanted. On the User interface side, this is probably the worst of the top keyboards (well, I have not tried Kurzweil). Compared to even the Nords one velocity layer samples, I found the sound to be somewhat of inferior quality. I do not know if that is linked to the fact that it was the 61 key version, but the NS2 felt of higher quality overall. I know everybody praised the Yamahas for their acoustic sounds but now adays I think Korg is definitely ahead in every single aspect. Specially the full orchestral sounds, I found the Motif ones to be uninspiring. Maybe I was expecting too much and got disappointed. NS2 has better pianos. Way better.
Afterwards, I tried the Juno Stage.. Man such a different league! it feels so cheap, the sounds are very GENERAL-MIDI like compared to the top notch workstations. I have seen people try to compare that one to the Nord Stage, specially because fo the price difference. But the Juno is IMO extremely inferior to the NS2. only good things about it is the audio routing possibilites, which do work and seems like its going to be useful to someone.
Then I tried the Kawai MP-10. The piano and EP sounds were fantastic, they definitely impressed me. It has a very limited sonic range, but the few sounds it has are extremely good. Just like the Nord Stage.
So that´s my story. If you have any specific questions as to how what compares to what feel free to ask them. I hope that after spending 1 hr on each, I can answer any doubt.