Page 1 of 2

Why I just returned a Nord Stage 3, a Review

Posted: 20 Feb 2025, 06:41
by DuncanLangworth
(technically, I returned it because it incurred some damage during shipping, so this is really why I am getting my money back instead of a replacement).

I've lusted after these beautiful red instruments for over a decade. I would always play them in music stores and have fun with the knobs and sounds.

My goal was to produce a silent practice station with headphones for acoustic piano (Jazz + Classical) and Rhodes (Jazz). I thought I had a good (read: expensive) solution: stack a Nord Stage 3 Compact on top of a Kawai VPC-1. Use the VPC-1 for keys and the Nord for sounds. Perfect...or so I thought.

I have a very nice grand piano, but it lights up the whole house--great when I am playing nice sounding music but less great when I am playing scales, or the same measure twenty times, or it's midnight. I also have a Rhodes MkI, and it's fun to play, but not to practice on. Playing one of these is an exercise in historical re-enactment. The action is slow and clunky, the voicing isn't so even, even when these things are "perfect", and it wants to be coupled with a guitar amp and driven kind of hard, which makes it loud.

As a consequence of having high-end instruments already, and the fact that I work with sound/audio for a living, I'm probably a bit more snobbish about the sound quality and authenticity than most. Consider yourself warned :)

I figured that Nord has a great reputation for sound when it comes to both of these instruments, and could be paired with headphones for quiet play. I could eventually explore the synth and tonewheel sections and have some fun / broaden horizons. So I ordered the Nord Stage 3 compact and a Kawai VPC-1.

By this weekend, everything had arrived, and I put it together.

The VPC-1 is great...but the Nord was a huge disappointment..

First, the piano sounds suck. None of them constitute a serviceable acoustic piano simulation when played through headphones. The Yamaha Motif XS workstation that I bought thirteen years ago sounds better than this with a fraction of the compute resources. The Roland RD-2000 that my father uses also sounds better. I honestly can't figure out why they are so bad or how, but they don't stand up to scrutiny at all, and doubly-so for classical music. They sound thin and boxy at the same time. They don't evoke the instruments that they are supposed to sound like. It's weird how bad they are given the good reputation. My guess is--they build these for pop/rock performance via a PA system or when "cutting through the mix" with a bunch of other instruments and not for people playing acoustic art music by themselves.

Second, the way they manage audio processing headroom sucks. The Nord board has a large collection of effects, amp simulators, layering capabilities, and the like which can make things very loud. Obviously they don't want clipping, so they make the sections themselves fairly quiet, even at maximum volume. This creates a problem where if you're just using a naked piano sound, they've attenuated it so much that the sound quality is harmed. There just isn't enough dynamic range above the noise floor to reproduce an acoustic piano well.

Third, the headphone amp sucks. It's weak and prone to distortion. It can't drive relatively easy cans like HD650s at a reference listening level, and forget about the really nice ones. I ended up pairing it with a proper headphone amp and that sort of helped, but the output was still too quiet even over line level because of the headroom issue, and to get it to a reasonable listening volume on a naked piano sound resulted in a not-so-black background.

One thing that it absolutely nailed was the Rhodes MkI sound. I was able to plug it into the same amp as my Rhodes and make them sound bang-on identical with a little tweaking. That was pretty cool.

I didn't love the semi-weighted keybed, but I knew that was going to happen going in--that's why I paired it with the VPC-1. The lightweight keys were fun for screwing around with organs/synths, but it's inadequate for piano/e-piano.

For now, I will be using the VPC-1 with Pianoteq 6 and I'm sure I'll miss the fun knobs a little bit, but they weren't worth the astronomical price or the fact that this thing can't accomplish my main goals. It's not perfect, but it is dramatically better and feels a lot more like playing a piano. If anyone has other recommendations for piano simulation software, particularly anything that can be run in a binaural/player-perspective manner, I'm willing to try some more stuff.

Anyways--I feel like I watched 500 reviews of this thing and none of them said any of this stuff, so I'm putting it out there. I think for a lot of people--especially people playing with bands and lugging it around public transportation, this board is great. It packs a TON of capability into a compelling package that is great for real-time performance. It's just too bad they couldn't get some of the basics right.

Re: Why I just returned a Nord Stage 3, a Review

Posted: 20 Feb 2025, 08:28
by MrLeoMadrid
the piano sounds suck? No further questions, Your Honor

Re: Why I just returned a Nord Stage 3, a Review

Posted: 20 Feb 2025, 09:33
by FZiegler
There are so many puzzling points with your review from my perspective. Starting with the question where you got a Stage 3 from almost two years after production stopped. Going on to the question why you would buy an organ centered keyboard just for playing piano or why a dedicated stage keyboard for practicing at home. From my perspective, there are downsides for the combination with a VPC1, but you even don't mention them.

I happen to connect my VPC1 to my NS3C when practicing at home and the result is absolutely uplifting. It brightens my mind. But I can't activate pedal noise because it won't work correctly when driven from a continuous pedal; on a NS3, you still need the Nord Triple Pedal to get it to work. I sometimes even loose sustain when playing the NS3C from my VPC1. That's why I won't use that combination anymore on gigs.

There are also two different philosophies in handling fast repetition notes on MIDI for Kawai and Nord keyboards. The NS3C even doesn't have a triple sensor keybed, I think. The Kawai would send Note-on, Note-on, Note-off, Note-off for a note plus the same note hit again only with the 3rd sensor. Which may result in only a single note on the Nord piano engine. IIRC.

I'm very fine with the headphone amp on my NS3, but it indeed seems to depend on the headphone you use if you get enough steam from it. This is a known issue with all Nord keyboards: It's not their main goal to be played with headphones at home, and they may require an external headphone amp to drive especially those with more impedance.

To have fun practicing piano at home with a Nord keyboard, I would have chosen a Grand 2. But even your combination should have worked -- just not out of the box. I use an alternate velocity curve to get satisfied with that combination. Plus there are -- as you mention -- some knobs to turn to get the sound you want. You may wonder if ever a Nord is best bet for classical music -- I don't think that's what it's made for; but at least it should be able to do the job.

Re: Why I just returned a Nord Stage 3, a Review

Posted: 20 Feb 2025, 13:59
by ajstan
Looking forward to reading your upcoming review of the M1 Macs on the Apple enthusiasts’ forum.

Re: Why I just returned a Nord Stage 3, a Review

Posted: 20 Feb 2025, 16:06
by cphollis
"My guess is--they build these for pop/rock performance via a PA system or when "cutting through the mix" with a bunch of other instruments and not for people playing acoustic art music by themselves."

Well, yeah, that's what Nords are designed for -- live performance workflows. Most people use software instruments for studio work.

We just finished yet another NAMM that reinforced my belief that -- after evaluating all the new products --- yup, Nord is still on top by a good margin. The APs in particular always stand out.

Re: Why I just returned a Nord Stage 3, a Review

Posted: 20 Feb 2025, 17:47
by tomzi
DuncanLangworth wrote: 20 Feb 2025, 06:41
For now, I will be using the VPC-1 with Pianoteq 6 and I'm sure I'll miss the fun knobs a little bit, but they weren't worth the astronomical price or the fact that this thing can't accomplish my main goals.

If you like Pianoteq, you could check out the new Roland V Stage, with Piano Modeling Engine......and a lot of knobs....Perhaps that´s more your taste...

Re: Why I just returned a Nord Stage 3, a Review

Posted: 20 Feb 2025, 21:03
by Mr_-G-
If it is true that you also own a Nord Piano 5 (and an Electro, according to your own user info above), you could have saved a lot of money and time by trying the sounds on the Piano 5.

Re: Why I just returned a Nord Stage 3, a Review

Posted: 21 Feb 2025, 05:49
by tsss27
I honestly don't know how someone can say the Motif XS pianos sound better when playing via headphones. I get that some people prefer them on loud rock gigs and such, but for your application the Nord should be miles better -- way more personality, depth and realism.
I got lots of volume with every Nord, with every set of headphones I tried. Certainly enough to where I wouldn't ever max the volume.
I do remember one time I used a headphone adapter cable which the Nord didn't like and everything was mono...switched adapters and all was fine. I suppose it is just possible you used an adapter that the Nord doesn't like and you heard everything in mono hence the sucky pianos...

Re: Why I just returned a Nord Stage 3, a Review

Posted: 21 Feb 2025, 11:43
by analogika
tsss27 wrote: 21 Feb 2025, 05:49 I honestly don't know how someone can say the Motif XS pianos sound better when playing via headphones. I get that some people prefer them on loud rock gigs and such, but for your application the Nord should be miles better -- way more personality, depth and realism.
The Motif pianos aren't "real" pianos: they're idealised versions that represent "standard" pianos — bright upright, stately grand, etc. and work very, very well in a mix to bring that particular character to a production. I can see why people prefer them.

But the Nord pianos are individually sampled instruments with very specific characters. That does put some people off initially, but while you may not like the individual instruments, to criticise them for "the sound quality and authenticity" does not make sense to me.

Re: Why I just returned a Nord Stage 3, a Review

Posted: 21 Feb 2025, 12:44
by M_a_c