I think a monitor + catch implementation would be the best possible theoretically, but whether that's going to be quicker than a simple "catch" mode, I don't know. I would rather think it's going to be slower, because it involves checking the value first and then moving the pot.anotherscott wrote:You can minimize that by moving the slider "gingerly" but that will make it take longer for you to complete the operation. (And either way, you still need to "know" where the current real value is, relative to the position of the slider.)
By the way, on the NS4, if the main problem is sliders, that's already solved because the "monitor" function are the LEDs themselves.

