Re: 2 DI boxes or stereo Direct
Posted: 21 Feb 2023, 21:04
P.S.: another one with a small footprint but a much lower price is the DBX DJDI
Edit: no through of the input signal though
Edit: no through of the input signal though
This 'unofficial' Forum is dedicated to the Clavia Nord Keyboards, including the Nord Stage, Nord Electro and Nord Piano. Discuss any issues around Nord's keyboards, share your favorite patches, samples, and music. We are not affiliated with Clavia!
https://www.norduserforum.com/
That's not always the case especially with passive DI's. In working on live recording DIs would used to keep the number of mic's on stage down, but the split from the DI one side was weaker than the other. The recording truck would get the stronger signal and the FOH would get the weaker signal. FOH engineers weren't happy but recording took priority to the band's management. Active DI's the signals should be equal since there is a circuit splitting the signal not just a transformer as in passive.Mr_-G- wrote:Check the DI box you have, they often have a "Hi Z Out" which is a mirror of the unbalanced input. You can use that to connect to your monitor.
See maxpiano reply 2 pages ago.Spider wrote:Again, maybe I'm missing something but if Mel only needs a copy of the signal for personal monitoring, why not just use the 3 and/or 4 output of the NS3?
I think some effects will disappear when routed away from outputs 1 and 2. The Leslie sim is one of them. I run my Organ through output 3 and it removes the Leslie sim automagically.Spider wrote:Again, maybe I'm missing something but if Mel only needs a copy of the signal for personal monitoring, why not just use the 3 and/or 4 output of the NS3?
If the point is adding as little complication as possible, a DI box seems like an unnecessary additional box+cables.
Btw, I never understood the point of having personal DI boxes. For small gigs, when short (less than 10 m) cables are more than enough to run sound, they are superfluous. For large gigs I've played, they were always provided by the organization/soundman (and we invlude them in the rider, just in case). Bottom line, I've never owned one nor felt the need to buy one.
I use a KL-8 as well and sound people love that they can just plug in one or two XLR cables and they are done-ericL wrote:I think some effects will disappear when routed away from outputs 1 and 2. The Leslie sim is one of them. I run my Organ through output 3 and it removes the Leslie sim automagically.Spider wrote:Again, maybe I'm missing something but if Mel only needs a copy of the signal for personal monitoring, why not just use the 3 and/or 4 output of the NS3?
If the point is adding as little complication as possible, a DI box seems like an unnecessary additional box+cables.
Btw, I never understood the point of having personal DI boxes. For small gigs, when short (less than 10 m) cables are more than enough to run sound, they are superfluous. For large gigs I've played, they were always provided by the organization/soundman (and we invlude them in the rider, just in case). Bottom line, I've never owned one nor felt the need to buy one.
DI boxes are very useful! I've always had them in my rig for 35+ years. Sound engineers at venues large and small are always happy with this. Lately my DI is connected to my mixer, whether that is the built in DIs in the Radial KL-8 or Key Largo.
Headphones for on stage? No, haven’t considered. Thought iem would be better choice. Hmmm. I’ve been going the basic mono wired to the pa and my monitor for years it’s worked well. Sometimes I use that little old DI box, but not always. Have experienced sound guys equipped and non equipped with DIs.maxpiano wrote:If need only your NS3 in the monitor, have you considered using the Headphones output for that? Then, if you also want to send stereo to the FOH yes you need 2 DIs (or a stereo=dual channel DI)