patrickdafunk wrote:But maybe you can mimic some stuff, like setting up a 'ambience microphone' in the room and recording the space when recording directly on a nord stage. And mixing these too with each other. But maybe I'm taking this too far now and should just start saving for a Grand + microphones and record a solo piano in 20 years.
Yeah, I think there are two main things contributing to the detail of a real grand, and these are quite hard to reproduce in a sampled instrument:
1. A real grand responds to velocity across the whole velocity range, whereas in a sampled piano the behaviour is "quantised" to a few velocity layers (was it now 4 in case of Nord?). There's probably cross-fading between the layers, but still the response is not what it is in a real thing. I feel the difference is most prominent in softest and loudest playing, mid-range not so much.
2. A sampled instrument is sampled note-by-note. Yes, there are string resonance samples in Nord, but I don't think they capture at all how the instrument itself resonates, vibrates and responds to your chords, which themselves vary infinitely in e.g. how loud the individual notes are played, what other notes you might have lingering under your sustain pedal etc. You get only so far by sampling, to really capture an instrument you would have to model it, but I think we are still quite far from modelling a grand piano in detail.
That said, I still think it is mostly solo jazz or classical piano where you hear the difference in practise. In pop/rock where you have a band or even just a singer with a piano I really can't and don't pay attention to if the piano is real or not, but in an album like the Iiro Rantala album I linked it is oh so clear that a real grand is so much more real and alive.