Stage 2 vs Piano 5

Everything about Nord keyboards in general; which one to choose, the sound manager, sample editor, and general discussion about the sample and piano libraries.
anotherscott
Posts: 3564
Joined: 07 Jan 2011, 04:50
15
Has thanked: 55 times
Been thanked: 1128 times

Re: Stage 2 vs Piano 5

Post by anotherscott »

Oh yes, I forgot about the variable of the aftertouch strip, which could alter the landing, good point.
User avatar
maxpiano
Patch Creator
Posts: 7349
Joined: 27 Jun 2011, 13:29
14
Your Nord Gear #1: Nord Stage 3
Location: Italy
Has thanked: 563 times
Been thanked: 2580 times
Italy

Re: Stage 2 vs Piano 5

Post by maxpiano »

anotherscott wrote:Oh yes, I forgot about the variable of the aftertouch strip, which could alter the landing, good point.
I always wonder how much does it really, at the end of the day if you ever opened a keyboard and look at the actual thickness of the AT strip... don't know, probably it does to some extent, but I still believe that velocity curves/response play the main part (I can see how much it matters e.g. when I use the Rav275 on the iPad and play with its velocity curve, without touching the master's touch response)
Last edited by maxpiano on 27 Feb 2022, 20:36, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
cphollis
Posts: 2024
Joined: 01 Mar 2013, 20:56
13
Your Nord Gear #1: Nord Stage 4
Your Nord Gear #2: Nord Piano 5
Location: Vero Beach, Fl
Has thanked: 78 times
Been thanked: 915 times
United States of America

Re: Stage 2 vs Piano 5

Post by cphollis »

@maxpiano -- I found it depended on the material. Maybe I'd be OK for 95% of the time, but when it was a bother, it was a real bother. Things like hammering out 16th note fifths quickly, percussive chords and similar were a mess, but worked perfectly on a non-aftertouch board. Maybe I could have learned to overcome it, but ... the new NS3 had just came out, so ....
I think I have gear issues ....
User avatar
maxpiano
Patch Creator
Posts: 7349
Joined: 27 Jun 2011, 13:29
14
Your Nord Gear #1: Nord Stage 3
Location: Italy
Has thanked: 563 times
Been thanked: 2580 times
Italy

Re: Stage 2 vs Piano 5

Post by maxpiano »

cphollis wrote:@maxpiano -- I found it depended on the material. Maybe I'd be OK for 95% of the time, but when it was a bother, it was a real bother. Things like hammering out 16th note fifths quickly, percussive chords and similar were a mess, but worked perfectly on a non-aftertouch board. Maybe I could have learned to overcome it, but ... the new NS3 had just came out, so ....
Sure cphollis, I didn't mean your perception was not accurate, that was not my intent, just sharing some thoughts and since you mention fast repetitions, I still think that 3rd sensor and velocity curve play a relevant part in that case, but regardless technicalities one has to choose what he/she finds best to play :thumbup:
Last edited by maxpiano on 28 Feb 2022, 11:24, edited 1 time in total.
nordkeys
Posts: 21
Joined: 13 Aug 2019, 17:18
6
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 9 times
United States of America

Re: Stage 2 vs Piano 5

Post by nordkeys »

anotherscott wrote:
maxpiano wrote:I think also the weighting is different, NS2 uses a TP40L while NP5 should use a TP40M at least (if I remember well from other discussions), however for sure velocity curves and software (Virtual Hammer Action and usage of third sensor) probably make the biggest part of the perceived difference (if any)
NS2 used the TP40M... or at least definitely not the TP40L, a lighter action that Kurzweil has often used. Though it is possible that the NP5 uses a heavier-than-M version of the TP40. (And thanks for mentioning the third sensor, which I forgot about, though is still not something that has an impact on feel per se.)
I can confirm the Piano 5 has the TP40H. Nord gave me the answer.
These users thanked the author nordkeys for the post (total 2):
wtibbit, maxpiano
Post Reply