Interesting comment and background on the design, thank you. But I'm puzzled why you think that comparing it with the original Wave is wrong? That's my benchmark as an owner and I would have loved to see an evolution of the original. That would be valuable for me and would mean I'd buy it. Losing key capabilities to use samples in synthesis totally negate the core value of the Wave as a synth in my view. It never made much sense as a simple ROMpler. Other people have different needs of course, but I can't see why this is looking at it the wrong way. As it seems to be a weird hotchpotch of A1 and Stage, maybe they should have called it something else?LewTheKeysGuy wrote:I honestly have to say that there are people looking at this the wrong way by trying to compare it against the original wave. Think about why the original wave was discontinued, you'd be surprised about the answer as to why. lew
The whole stage/organ side of things is anathema to me, although I understand this is where they make their money. Just seems a shame that their recent synths have been weak efforts in relation to their own history. The full spec isn't clear yet, but I think they've made some serious mistakes with this one - as with the NL4 (Gordon Reid's SOS review nails it) - that will put off a lot of the synth-focused user base. There are so many interesting things coming out at the moment in terms of modulars, new analogs, re-issues and powerful new hybrid/digitals (Quantum, Prophet X). I suspect this not-quite-a-Wave 2 will struggle in that context.