jazzystu wrote:Forget all this "upgrade" nonsense, ...
You are right with that !
Regards,
jazzystu wrote:Forget all this "upgrade" nonsense, ...
DanielD71 wrote:Hello ,
I received the same email (exact words) from Tomas J. regarding this upgrade.
Regards,
Hanon_CTS wrote:Clavia staff frequently use form letters for communications with outsiders
This is part of my disappointment with them as a company.
anotherscott wrote:Hanon_CTS wrote:Clavia staff frequently use form letters for communications with outsiders
This is part of my disappointment with them as a company.
Well, it does make sense, when people are sending in the exact same question, to send them out the same answer. And rewriting the same info again and again wouldn't be the most productive use of their time. It's certainly a lot better than the companies you write to and never hear back from at all!
colourisred wrote:The argument "not enough room" IMO is somewhat farfetched.
But I understand them, because their business is to sell new instruments,
anotherscott wrote:That sound awfully cynical to me. How do you reconcile that with Nord's industry-leading support FOR creating upgrades to older models? Why should they have made the C2 software-upgradable to the C2D then? I just don't think their actions match the approach you attribute to them. Room for code in a given model is finite, their explanation does not sound far-fetched to me at all. And especially since they did provide the upgrade for the C2, I don't see any reason to suspect it's not the truth, even if I were inclined to be more cynical than I am.
Users browsing this forum: tomzi and 79 guests